Tucson may join national lawsuit over census decision
WASHINGTON, D.C. (AP) - The Trump administration's decision to ask people about their citizenship in the 2020 census set off worries among Democrats on Tuesday that immigrants will dodge the survey altogether, diluting political representation for states that tend to vote Democratic and robbing many communities of federal dollars.
Not since 1950 has the census collected citizenship data from the whole population, rather than just a population sample, says the Congressional Research Service. The decision to restore the question after decades prompted an immediate lawsuit from California - already tangling with Washington D.C. over immigration - and moves by other states with large immigrant populations to engage in a legal fight.
21-year-old Alejandra Encinas came to the U.S. from Mexico five years ago and is now a permanent legal resident.
She has filled out the paperwork to become a U.S. citizen "But there are no guarantees" she says. She is not legally eligible to become a citizen until 2020 but it will likely be 2021 at the earliest.
"Hopefully I do become an American citizen," she said. "I look forward to that very, very much."
But much of whether that becomes a reality is out of her hands.
"Hopefully all of my paperwork is right and it's going to be okay for the immigration officer whose going to be looking at my application," she said.
Some applicants can be turned down for minor violations so she hopes for the best.
However, whether she will fill out the Census form if it contains a citizenship question is where she draws the line.
"Why do they need that information?" she asks. "I'm not required to give that to my administrators, my boss, my school or anyone so that's a huge concern for me."
It is also driven by her concern about deportation, which she says it a real concern for the people who have applied for citizenship but not yet become citizens.
"I mean, honestly I think to make a point, I won't fill out the census at all," she said. "Because sometimes we need to do certain things to send a message."
Encinas is just one of 33,000 people in Tucson who have a legal right to live in the U.S., but have not yet become citizens.
Depending on how many make the same decision can be worth millions of dollars to the city of Tucson. Both state shared revenues and federal programs dole out money to cities based on population.
"If you undercount your population, you don't get the money to serve your population," said Tucson Mayor Jonathan Rothschild.
State shared revenues can be as high as $600 a person. "Do the math," said the Mayor.
The Census is done every ten years which makes each person worth about $6,000 over the ten year period. "It makes a big difference in the services we can deliver," he said.
The Mayor did not commit to joining a national lawsuit but said "my inclination would be that we should join with other states and other cities."
"To depress that count by making questions that would make people afraid to come forward when they should come forward, isn't the right thing to do," he said.
The population count, a massive effort taken every 10 years, is far more than an academic exercise. It's required by the Constitution and used to determine the number of seats each state has in the House as well as how federal money is distributed to local communities. Communities and businesses depend on it in deciding where to build schools, hospitals, grocery stores and more.
The political stakes of undercounting segments of the population are high.
Several states that have slowing population growth or high numbers of immigrants such as California, New York, Illinois, Massachusetts and Ohio are typically at risk of losing U.S. House seats when their congressional districts are redrawn every 10 years - depending on how fully their residents are counted.
California struck quickly, with Attorney General Xavier Becerra filing a federal lawsuit Tuesday that seeks to block Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross' decision to add a citizenship question in 2020. Officials from New York and New Jersey, also Democratic-led states, were also planning on leading or participating in lawsuits. Massachusetts signaled interest, too.
"The census constitutes the backbone for planning how and where our communities will invest taxpayer dollars," Becerra said. "California simply has too much to lose to allow the Trump Administration to botch this important decennial obligation.
The Justice Department said in a statement it "looks forward to defending the reinstatement of the citizenship question, which will allow the department to protect the right to vote and ensure free and fair elections for all Americans." The Commerce Department said the benefits of obtaining citizenship information "outweighed the limited potential adverse impacts."
Their argument in essence: Enforcing voting rights requires more data on the voting-age population of citizens than current surveys are providing.
Democratic lawmakers had been bracing for the decision. A bill sponsored by Rep. Carolyn Maloney, D-N.Y. would block the addition of a citizenship question, or any major design change, unless it has undergone a certain level of research and testing, but it faces dim prospects with no Republicans signing on.
House Democratic leader Nancy Pelosi said Tuesday that adding such a question "will inject fear and distrust into vulnerable communities and cause traditionally undercounted communities to be even further under-represented, financially excluded and left behind."
Some Republican lawmakers hailed the decision on Tuesday. GOP Sens. Jim Inhofe of Oklahoma, Tom Cotton of Arkansas and Ted Cruz of Texas had sent a letter to the Commerce Department asking Ross to add the question.
"It is imperative that the data gathered in the census is reliable, given the wide ranging impacts it will have on U.S. policy," Cruz said in a press release issued by the three lawmakers. "A question on citizenship is a reasonable, commonsense addition to the census."
The Census Bureau separately conducts an ongoing survey called the American Community Survey that provides citizenship data on a yearly basis. But it only samples a small portion of the population.
Before that, citizenship or related questions were asked of about 1 in 6 households on the census "long form," which has since been retired. The Congressional Research Service said it has been 1950 since all households were asked about citizenship.
Alabama Attorney General Steven Marshall said the American Community Survey is so small, with a correspondingly large margin of error, that it is an ineffective tool for understanding lightly populated rural areas of the country.
"It just makes sense that government has a more accurate record for the census and reinstates the practice of including a citizenship question in the next census," Marshall said.
A joint fundraising committee for Trump's re-election campaign and the Republican National Committee highlighted the addition of a citizenship question in a fundraising pitch last week. The pitch said Trump wants the 2020 Census to ask people whether or not they are citizens, and that in another era, this would be common sense.
"The President wants to know if you're on his side," the solicitation asks.
Census counts are taken by mail and by workers walking neighborhoods. The Census Bureau says the 2010 census drew a massive response, with about 74 percent of the households mailing in forms and remaining households counted by workers in neighborhoods.
Information is only released publicly in the aggregate, although the government has the details. In 2010, the Obama administration offered assurances that the census data would not be used for immigration enforcement.
The Census Bureau states on its website that personal information obtained through its surveys cannot be used against respondents by any government agency or court. And the disclosure by an employee of any information that would personally identify a respondent or family can lead to up to five years in prison or a fine of $250,000, or both.
Critics of the decision seemed far more focused Tuesday on the potential for intimidation and an inaccurate count than the prospect that the information could be used to target participants for deportation.
"I can only see one purpose for why this question is being added," said Arturo Vargas, executive director of the National Association of Latino Elected and Appointed Officials Educational Fund, an organization that seeks to advance Latino political engagement. It's to "scare Latinos and others from participating in the 2020 Census."
Copyright 2018 Tucson News Now. All rights reserved.
The Associated Press contributed to this article.